Perspectives

Market Entry: Government Relations

Why the government side of a new market belongs in the business case.

By Nicola Iorizzo, Director of International Projects, Europe

Government relations for market entry is the work of preparing a new country's government for a company before the company arrives. It means knowing which ministries and regulators must approve the business, how long each approval really takes, which political risks could change the terms, and which local partners and stakeholders officials will listen to. Done early, it shortens approvals and removes surprises. Done late, it turns a commercial plan into a negotiation nobody budgeted for.

What does government relations for market entry involve?

It is the part of an entry plan that deals with the state rather than the customer. A market study tells a company whether there is demand. Government relations tells it whether it will be allowed to serve that demand, on what terms, and how soon. In practice it covers four things: the approvals the business needs, the officials and agencies who grant them, the political conditions that could change the terms, and the local relationships that make a newcomer credible. Lincoln Strategy Group does this work for companies and institutions across 19 industries and 73 countries, and the questions stay the same even when the answers change. Who has to say yes? In what order? What do they need to see? And who else will have a view before they decide?

When should a company start talking to a government about entry?

Before the investment decision, not after it. Many companies treat government contact as a launch task: the entity is formed, the office is leased, and someone is asked to arrange meetings. By then the expensive choices are made. Licensing timelines, ownership limits and screening reviews can decide whether the business case works at all, so they belong in the business case. A sensible rhythm has three stages. During market selection, a desk review of the rules and the political calendar, plus informal conversations with people who know the ministries. Before commitment, a full map of approvals and early, low-key contact with the agencies that will decide. After commitment, formal applications and a steady program of engagement through launch and the first year of operation, when inspections, renewals and local disputes begin.

Which approvals should a company expect?

More than the company registry suggests. Registering a company is usually the easy step. The harder ones are sector licenses, permits tied to a site, and, more and more often, a review of the investment itself. The World Bank's Business Ready project, the successor to its Doing Business report, benchmarks business entry and business location as two of its ten topics, and it measures how rules work in practice, not only what they say on paper. Investment screening has spread too. In the United States, CFIUS, an interagency committee chaired by the Treasury, reviews certain foreign investments for their effect on national security. The United Kingdom's National Security and Investment Act, in force since January 2022, makes notification mandatory for deals in 17 sensitive areas of the economy. The European Union's screening framework has applied since October 2020, and a revised regulation will require every member state to run a screening mechanism. Governments across the Middle East, Africa and Asia run their own regimes, often with foreign ownership caps or local partner requirements in particular sectors. The practical step is the same everywhere: list every approval, who grants it and how long it realistically takes, then plan the sequence backward from the opening date.

How should a company read political risk before entering?

Separate the risks that build slowly from the ones that arrive overnight. Slow risks include changes to tax regimes, labor law, local content rules and foreign ownership limits. They show up first in party platforms, ministerial speeches, draft bills and consultation papers, so they can be watched and planned around. Fast risks include an election that reverses a policy, new sanctions, a change of minister, or a public dispute that makes a sector politically toxic. These cannot be forecast with confidence, so they need contingency plans: a structure that limits exposure, a route out, and relationships broad enough to survive a change of government. One test is worth applying to every approval the company needs. If the official who grants it were replaced next year, would the approval survive? If the honest answer is no, the relationship base is too narrow.

How do you choose a local partner?

On the strength of their standing, not only their access. In many markets a local partner is required by law or expected in practice, as a joint-venture party, a distributor or an agent. The temptation is to pick the partner with the best connections. That works until the political weather changes, at which point the company inherits the partner's enemies along with their friends. Better tests are a reputation that holds across the political spectrum, a clean record under anti-bribery and sanctions checks, a business that does not depend on a single patron, and a willingness to put the terms of the relationship in writing. Diligence on a partner should be as thorough as diligence on an acquisition, because in the eyes of the government the partner is the company.

A readiness checklist before entering a new market

Seven questions should have clear answers before a company commits capital. First, which approvals does the business need, who grants each one, and how long does each take? Second, does any part of the investment trigger screening, ownership limits or a local partner requirement? Third, which ministries, regulators and regional authorities will shape operating conditions after launch? Fourth, what does the political calendar hold for the next three years: elections, budget cycles, pending legislation? Fifth, which local stakeholders, from industry associations to communities near a site, will officials hear from? Sixth, what does the company bring that officials can point to in public, such as jobs, skills, exports or technology? Seventh, who inside the company owns the government relationship, and who on the ground speaks for it? A company that can answer all seven is ready to engage. One that cannot is still doing research, whatever the launch date says.

Does the work differ from region to region?

The sequence holds; the weight shifts. In the European Union, much of the work runs through formal procedures, published consultations and transparency registers, while national ministries still decide licensing and screening. In parts of the Gulf and Asia, approvals often move through a smaller circle of senior decision-makers and state-linked entities, so early introductions and patience count for more. In many markets in Africa and the Americas, provincial and municipal authorities hold real power over sites and permits, and community support can set the pace of a project. These are tendencies, not rules. Every engagement begins from zero, and the map of one country is no guide to the next.

Common questions

How long does government approval for market entry take?
It depends on the sector and the structure of the deal. Registering a company can take days in many economies. Sector licenses, site permits and investment screening can take months, and reviews can run longer if officials ask for more information. The realistic duration is the slowest approval on the critical path, so map every approval first and plan backward from the opening date, with a margin for delay.
Do companies need to register as lobbyists when entering a new market?
Sometimes. Many jurisdictions regulate contact with officials through lobbying registers, transparency registers or rules on meetings with public servants, and the thresholds differ widely. Routine applications to a licensing authority are usually treated differently from advocacy on policy. Check the rules in each country before the first meeting, and keep a record of contacts with officials from the start.
Is political risk insurance a substitute for government relations?
No. Insurance, including cover from multilateral and national agencies, can compensate a company for specific losses such as expropriation or currency restrictions. It does not secure a license, shorten a review or keep a relationship with a ministry in good order. The two work together: insurance limits the cost of a bad outcome, and government relations lowers the chance of one.
Should a company hire former officials to help with market entry?
Former officials can explain how a ministry works, but they are not a strategy. Many countries have cooling-off rules that limit what they may do, and relying on one person's contacts ties the company's standing to that person. Use their knowledge to build a broad map of decision-makers, and make sure the company's case can stand on its own merits.

Sources

Related practice areas

Trusted by more than a thousand organizations since 2003.

Begin a conversation